Little over a decade ago, on June 24, 2013, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Ltd had an extremely volatile day on the bourses after the company announced the decision of its board not to apply for a banking licence. The announcement was made during the trading hours. The stock fell as much as 15.91 per cent to hit the day\u2019s low of Rs216.25 soon after the company made the announcement. However, as bargain hunting emerged at lower levels, the stock pared some of its losses.<\/p>\n
M&M Financial Services decided not to proceed with the application for a banking licence after reviewing the guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for such an application, along with the clarifications issued by the central bank earlier that month. The company said its board expressed full confidence in M&M Financial Services\u2019 plans and prospects for growth as an independent non-banking financial company (NBFC).<\/p>\n
The RBI guidelines provided for the conversion of the NBFC into a bank, but did not offer any flexibility in terms of meeting the reserve requirements \u2014 cash reserve ratio and statutory liquidity ratio were applicable from the inception of the bank. That was the stumbling block.<\/p>\n
Fast forward to July 27, 2023. Parent\u00a0Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd\u2019s (M&M) shares dropped 6.9 per cent in intra-day trading, after the company said it has acquired a 3.53 per cent stake in RBL Bank Ltd and indicated that it might increase the stake up to 9.9 per cent in the future.<\/p>\n
M&M did not spell out the rationale behind the share purchase. \u201cWe have acquired a 3.53 per cent stake in RBL Bank as an investment at a cost of Rs417 crore,\u201d the company said in an exchange filing. \u201cWe may consider further investment subject to pricing, regulatory approvals and required procedures. However, in no circumstance will it exceed 9.9 per cent,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n
Flashback to April 2021.\u00a0M&M Managing Director (MD) Anish Shah, in his first interview as the chief executive of the group, said the conglomerate could apply for a banking licence. \u201cWe feel that from a governance standpoint we will meet all the criteria,\u201d he told\u00a0The Economic Times<\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n However, the group was yet to decide whether its foray into formal banking will be through an acquisition of a private bank, or by acquiring a public-sector bank. \u201cThe Mahindra group does not borrow from Mahindra Finance today. If anything, we actually lend to Mahindra Finance sometimes when required and we put in the capital earlier this year as well,\u201d Shah said.<\/p>\n Against this backdrop, the July 27 exchange filing by the company made many of us believe that Shah was walking the talk. As we were eagerly waiting for the drama to unfold, the denouement happened too fast. On August 4, at an analysts\u2019 call after announcing the June quarter earnings of M&M,\u00a0Shah\u00a0made it clear that the company would not increase its capital allocation in RBL Bank unless it finds a compelling strategic value in the bank.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is an investment of Rs417 crore today. It\u2019s an investment in a sector that is the core sector for us, financial services, a sector that we want to grow a lot more \u2026 This investment is in a sector in which we have almost Rs40,000 crore market cap… And this investment is really for us to understand banking in a lot more detail with a very long-term view \u2014 seven- to 10-year view. There are no assumptions on our part today whether we want to get into banking or not. In fact, at this point of time, we cannot and don\u2019t want to\u2026.,\u201d Shah had said, adding, \u201cAt this stage, we don\u2019t expect to go higher \u2026 At some point in the future, if there is a compelling strategic reason, we need to evaluate in line with our capital allocation policy \u2026.\u201d<\/p>\n Why did the company zero in on RBL Bank to understand the business of banking? Well, according to Shah, it\u2019s a great investment opportunity with a one-time price-to-book value, a very well-run bank with a good management. He expects this investment to generate handsome returns over time. Price-to-book or P\/V value is the ratio of the market value of a company\u2019s share price over its book value of equity \u2014 the value of a company\u2019s assets.<\/p>\n At the current level of equity ownership, M&M is the third largest shareholder in RBL Bank, following Baring Private Equity Asia (9.9 per cent) and British International Investment (little over 6 per cent).<\/p>\n While the M&M investors heaved a sigh of relief, one gentleman must be all smiles after this, RBL Bank MD and CEO R Subramaniakumar.<\/p>\n In the not-so-distant past, the bank was not in the best of shape. On\u00a0December 27, 2021, the RBI issued this release after some depositors started withdrawing money from the bank: \u201cThere has been speculation relating to the RBL Bank in certain quarters which appears to be arising from recent events surrounding the bank. \u2026 There is no need for depositors and other stakeholders to react to the speculative reports. The bank\u2019s financial health remains stable.\u201d<\/p>\n Subramaniakumar, former MD and CEO of Indian Overseas Bank, took over the helm on June 22, 2022. He has addressed the trust deficit among the regulator, employees and customers by clinically focussing on governance issues. A string of committees has been set up at different levels, bridging the gap between the board and the employees. He has managed to arrest high attrition of staff; stabilised the bank; and, most importantly, brought it back to the growth path.<\/p>\n He is also exploiting the strength of the bank\u2019s banking correspondent subsidiary, RBL Finserve Ltd. Earlier, the two worked in silos \u2014 bank branches focussing on raising deposits and the subsidiary sourcing small loans. Now, they collaborate for every business and, as this opens new possibilities, RBL Bank is adding to his product kitty.<\/p>\n To be sure, RBL Bank was not a stretcher case. Even when the regulator intervened, it was well capitalised and its financial position was satisfactory. It came under the RBI glare years ago because of its insatiable lust for growth before putting in place the right risk management and credit appraisal practices. A few corporate loans turned bad and the expansion in unsecured loan book made the regulator wary.<\/p>\n In FY20 and FY21, its growth was muted. Before that, microfinance loans were 12 per cent of its loan book. The contribution of the unsecured credit card business to the overall loan portfolio was around 20 per cent, the highest in the industry.<\/p>\n As I write this column, credit cards continue to be around 24 per cent of its assets but the share of microfinance loans has come down to around 8 per cent. Overall, the wholesale loans are 46 per cent of the total book. While the average low-cost current and savings accounts or CASA is around 37.3 per cent of the total deposits in June, the portion of retail deposits has risen to close to 44 per cent. In the past one year, its gross bad loans have come down to 3.22 per cent from 4.08 per cent and, after provisioning, net bad loans have dropped from 2.35 per cent to 1 per cent.<\/p>\n By FY26, the bank plans to have three lines of business in equal proportion \u2014 wholesale, credit card and microfinance \u2014 and new products such as education loans, gold loans, small business loans, car and tractor loans and personal loans. The worst seems to be behind RBL Bank.<\/p>\n In his immediate past assignment, as an administrator, Subramaniakumar oversaw the insolvency process of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. In little over a year at RBL Bank, he has convinced the investors that his expertise goes beyond stress management.<\/p>\n This column first appeared in\u00a0<\/strong>Business Standard<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n The columnist is a Consulting Editor with\u00a0<\/strong>Business Standard<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0and Senior Adviser to Jana Small Finance Bank.<\/strong><\/p>\n