The Indian banking industry\u2019s celebrations over its FY2022 performance may not last long. Barring one private bank, all smiled their way to profits last year when the collective net profit of the listed banks was ~1.57 trillion, the highest in history.<\/p>\n
The first quarter of FY23 could be a different story. Many banks\u2019 profits will take a hit and a few of them could even end up being in the red because of treasury losses, triggered by a sudden spike in government bond yields in the rising interest rate cycle. Prices and yields of bonds move in opposite directions.<\/p>\n
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) raised its policy rate by 90 basis points (bps) to 4.9 per cent in two phases during the June quarter to fight high inflation. One basis point is a hundredth of a percentage point.<\/p>\n
Following this, the 10-year bond yield rose 61 bps in the June quarter \u2014 from 6.84 per cent on March 31 to 7.45 per cent. At some point during the quarter, the rise was as much as 80 bps. Over the past year, the 10-year bond yield has risen 140 bps.<\/p>\n
The banks are required to invest 18 per cent of their deposits in government securities but their average investment is little over 25 per cent now. Theoretically, 23 per cent is covered from any notional losses as they can be kept in the held to maturity (HTM) basket but most banks have been keeping less than 21 per cent in HTM. For the rest, when the prices drop, they need to book mark to market (MTM) losses.<\/p>\n
MTM is an accounting practice whereby an asset is valued at the market price and not at the price it is bought. So, when the prices drop, the difference between the purchase price and market price has to be provided for.<\/p>\n
Other than HTM, there are two other bond baskets that are subject to MTM\u00a0\u2014\u00a0available for sale or AFS and held for trading or HFT. While bonds from the AFS basket can be sold anytime, those in the HFT basket need to be sold within 90 days of buying.<\/p>\n
After raising ~7.1 trillion (gross borrowing) in FY20, the government borrowed little over ~13.7 trillion in FY21 and ~11.27 trillion in FY22 as the Covid-19 pandemic played havoc with the economy and the fiscal deficit rose. In the first quarter of FY23, the government\u2019s gross market borrowing has been ~3.9 trillion out of ~14.31 trillion budgeted for the year.<\/p>\n
Since April 2020, the central government has borrowed ~28.87 trillion. A back-of-the- envelope calculation puts the MTM loss at the current market price at around ~1.73 trillion. Of course, banks are not the only buyers of government bonds and even all bonds are not subject to MTM.\u00a0There are other buyers such as insurance firms, mutual funds and provident funds besides foreign investors.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s difficult to quantify loss of individual banks or, for that matter, the industry, as it depends on the maturity profile of the bonds and in which basket they are kept.<\/p>\n
Of course, India is not the only market where bond yields have gone up. The US 10-year yield has moved up from 1.51 per cent in December 2021 to 2.33 per cent by March 31, 2022, and 3.01 per cent by June 30, 2022, after hitting 3.48 per cent on June 14 with the Federal Reserve raising policy rate.<\/p>\n
Historically, we have seen steep yield movement in quite a few quarters that had created pain for banks.<\/p>\n
For instance, in the June quarter of 2004, the 10-year yield jumped by 69 bps\u00a0\u2014\u00a0from 5.16 per cent to 5.85 per cent.<\/p>\n
In the first quarter of 2008, the rise in yield was sharper\u00a0\u2014\u00a074 basis points (from 7.96 per cent to 8.70 per cent).<\/p>\n
The sharpest movement was seen in 2013 during the so-called taper tantrum\u00a0\u2014\u00a0when the US Federal Reserve announced paring the pace of its bond buying to reduce the amount of money it was feeding into the economy.\u00a0In the September quarter of 2013, the 10-year bond yield rose 201 bps\u00a0\u2014\u00a0from 7.46 per cent to 9.47 per cent.<\/p>\n
Similarly, in the June quarter of 2017, the yield rose 66 bps and, in the 2018 June quarter, 58 bps, putting pressure on banks\u2019 balance sheets.<\/p>\n
The RBI had come to the rescue of banks on at least three occasions.<\/p>\n
In 2004, the banking regulator opened a window, allowing banks to transfer their investment from AFS to HTM basket. It saved the banks from providing for the future MTM losses in AFS book as the yields were rising continuously.<\/p>\n
In 2013, during the taper tantrum, there was a run on the rupee and the RBI had to raise interest rate sharply which led to a spike in bond yields. At that time, the regulator allowed banks to transfer bonds from the AFS to the HTM basket at almost the price at which they were bought, saving their balance sheets from huge MTM losses.<\/p>\n
In 2017, too, when the yields rose, the RBI had extended a helping hand to the banks in a different way. It allowed them to provide for the MTM losses in four quarters instead of taking the hit upfront.<\/p>\n
\u201cFinancial market stability and the orderly evolution of the yield curve are public goods and both market participants and the RBI have a shared responsibility in this regard,\u201d\u00a0RBI Governor Shaktikanta Das had said in October 2020. Since then, both the governor and a deputy governor have emphasised on the \u201cpublic good\u201d aspect of the yield curve on many occasions while the RBI intervened in the bond market through different instruments to stall the movement of yields beyond a perceived comfort level.<\/p>\n
All these added to banks\u2019 confidence. They kept on buying bonds, swelling their investment book from ~36.85 trillion in March 2020 to ~48.44 trillion by early June 2022. In the same period, their deposit portfolio has grown from ~135.71 trillion to ~167.33 trillion. The banks have added about ~11.59 trillion to their investment book \u2014 36.65 per cent of their incremental deposits against the mandated 18 per cent investment\u00a0in government bonds.<\/p>\n
The RBI has facilitated this by continuously raising the HTM limit from 19.5 per cent to 22 per cent and, finally, to 23 per cent (with an understanding that the HTM limit would be pared to 19.5 per cent in phases starting from the June 2023 quarter). This has created demand for bonds and helped the government complete record high borrowing programmes in the past two years.\u00a0Overhang of surplus liquidity, too, helped banks add to their government bonds holdings.<\/p>\n
Will the RBI step in again with some kind of regulatory forbearance to ensure smooth sailing of the government\u2019s borrowing plan this year and banks\u2019 balance sheets? Will it raise the HTM limit and allow the banks to transfer bonds to this basket at the price they were bought? Or, will it offer them an opportunity to stomach the MTM losses in phases over the next four to six quarter?<\/strong><\/p>\n If this is not done, some of the\u00a0banks will be in the red but the loss will not erode their capital to the extent that they fall short of meeting the regulatory requirement.<\/strong><\/p>\n But there will not be any surprise if the RBI is not inclined to offer any dispensation as lower provision requirements for bad loans and higher net interest margin will help banks counter the treasury loss to some extent.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Indian banking industry\u2019s celebrations over its FY2022 performance may not last long. Barring one private bank, all smiled their way to profits last year…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3254,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3253"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3253\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3255,"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3253\/revisions\/3255"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3254"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bankerstrust.in\/column\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}